

When your long-term disability (LTD) claim is denied, you may assume the process has ended. In reality, a denial often marks the beginning of the most important phase of your claim. Understanding what happens next, what decisions matter most, and where mistakes commonly occur allows claimants to act strategically rather than react emotionally.
This article explains what typically happens after a disability claim denial, with a focus on ERISA and employer-sponsored LTD plans. It outlines the phases that follow, the decisions claimants must make, and how those choices affect appeals and potential litigation.
Under ERISA-governed long-term disability (LTD) policies, the steps you take after a denial largely determine whether benefits remain attainable.
A denial means the insurance company concluded that the claim did not meet the policy’s definition of disability. In ERISA long-term disability cases, the insurer controls the process from start to finish. The same company often evaluates eligibility and pays benefits, which creates inherent tension between financial incentives and fair claim handling.
Denials usually rely on stated reasons such as insufficient medical evidence, lack of objective findings, failure to meet the policy’s definition of disability, or conclusions that the claimant can perform other work. The denial letter matters. It outlines the insurer’s reasoning and triggers the next phase of the process.
Importantly, a denial does not mean the insurer’s decision is correct. It means the insurer has taken a position that must be challenged through specific procedural steps.
After issuing a denial, the insurer must provide a written explanation and describe appeal rights. In most ERISA LTD plans, the claimant has 180 days to file an administrative appeal. This deadline runs strictly. Missing it usually ends the claim permanently.
This post-denial window represents the most critical phase of the entire case. During this period, claimants can submit evidence, respond to the insurer’s rationale, and build the administrative record. Courts later rely almost exclusively on this record if litigation becomes necessary.
Claimants should treat the denial as a roadmap. Every stated reason for denial requires a direct, documented response. Silence or incomplete responses often become fatal weaknesses later.
After denial, most ERISA disability claims follow a predictable sequence. The first phase involves administrative appeals. The second phase involves a final decision by the insurer. The third phase, if benefits remain denied, involves potential federal litigation.
The appeal phase focuses on evidence development. The litigation phase focuses on legal review of the insurer’s decision. Because courts rarely allow new evidence, the appeal phase effectively determines the strength of any future lawsuit.
Each phase has different rules, risks, and objectives. Claimants who understand these distinctions avoid wasting time and preserve leverage.
The ERISA appeal allows claimants to challenge the denial internally. The insurer reviews its own decision, often using hired medical reviewers and vocational consultants. Although regulations require a “full and fair review,” insurers control the scope and tone of this process.
A successful appeal does not rely on volume alone. It requires targeted evidence that addresses functional limitations, reliability, attendance, and sustained work capacity. Treating physician statements should explain how symptoms translate into real-world work restrictions.
Vocational evidence also plays a central role. Insurers frequently argue that claimants can perform alternative occupations. Countering these assertions requires reasoned analysis, not conclusory statements.
Once the insurer issues a final denial after mandatory appeals, administrative remedies typically end.
A disability claim moves toward litigation after the insurer issues a final adverse decision. At that point, ERISA permits claimants to file suit in federal court. In Philadelphia, many LTD cases proceed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The lawsuit does not restart the claim. The court reviews whether the insurer’s decision complied with ERISA and the policy terms. In most cases, the judge reviews the administrative record without live testimony.
Timing matters. Many LTD policies impose contractual limitation periods that shorten the time to sue. Courts frequently enforce these deadlines. Claimants who wait too long lose their right to judicial review.
The most consequential decision involves how seriously to treat the appeal. Claimants who submit minimal appeals often assume they can explain more later. Under ERISA, later rarely exists.
Another critical decision involves evidence strategy. Claimants must decide whether to obtain detailed physician opinions, functional capacity evaluations, or vocational reports. These decisions shape the narrative the court eventually sees.
Claimants must also decide when to seek legal guidance. Because ERISA imposes procedural constraints unfamiliar to most people, early advice often prevents irreversible errors.
Insurers evaluate appeals by reviewing the record they helped create. They often rely on file reviews rather than in-person examinations. These reviewers may never meet the claimant.
Insurers tend to emphasize perceived inconsistencies, gaps in treatment, or lack of objective findings. They may discount subjective symptoms such as pain, fatigue, or cognitive impairment unless supported by a detailed functional analysis.
Understanding how insurers think allows claimants to anticipate weaknesses and respond proactively. Appeals succeed when they get rid of ambiguity rather than invite debate.
One common mistake involves missing deadlines. ERISA deadlines operate strictly and rarely allow exceptions. Another mistake involves relying solely on raw medical records without explanatory opinions.
Claimants also err by assuming fairness will prevail without advocacy. Insurers do not carry the burden to prove disability. Claimants must affirmatively demonstrate entitlement to benefits.
Finally, many claimants misunderstand voluntary appeals. While sometimes helpful, voluntary appeals can delay litigation and extend limitation periods unpredictably.
What happens if I lose my ERISA disability appeal?
If the insurer issues a final denial after mandatory appeals, you may file a federal lawsuit challenging the decision. Courts typically review the existing administrative record.
Can I submit new evidence after my appeal is denied?
In most cases, no. Courts rarely allow new evidence in ERISA cases. This limitation makes the appeal stage critically important.
How long does an insurer have to decide an appeal?
ERISA regulations impose decision deadlines, often 45 days with limited extensions. Delays can sometimes support procedural challenges.
Do I need a lawyer to appeal a disability denial?
While not required, legal guidance often improves outcomes. ERISA rules differ significantly from Social Security or private insurance claims.
Disability claim denials create pressure and uncertainty. ERISA amplifies that pressure by limiting evidence, imposing strict deadlines, and favoring insurers procedurally. Claimants who approach the process strategically protect their rights and preserve leverage.
Legal strategy does not guarantee litigation. Strong appeals sometimes reverse denials. However, every appeal should assume that litigation remains possible. That assumption shapes how evidence is gathered and presented.
A denied disability claim does not end the process, but it does narrow the path forward. Understanding the next phases and decisions protects your ability to pursue benefits under ERISA.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson represents long-term disability claimants in Philadelphia and throughout Pennsylvania. Our attorneys focus on ERISA appeals, administrative record development, and federal litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
If your disability claim was denied and you need clear guidance on what happens next, schedule a consultation with our team. Call Edelstein Martin & Nelson at (215) 731-9900 to speak with our disability insurance lawyer and discuss your options before critical deadlines expire.